California fails to overturn ban on affirmative action in college admissions

  • On November 3, California voters had a chance to overturn the state’s ban on affirmative action.
  • As of November 4, the effort to overturn the ban appears to have failed.

After the November 3 elections, California’s ban on affirmative action appears to remain intact.

California approved Proposition 209 in 1996, which declared that the state could not “discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.” Effectively, the measure banned the practice of affirmative action for the state and local governments, as well as school districts and the University of California system, among other entities. 

Proponents of Proposition 16 say the reversal would have helped boost college enrollment among Black and Latino students.

Californian voters had the opportunity to vote on Proposition 16, which would have overturned Proposition 209, making affirmative action legal for governmental entities in California. However, with nearly 12 million votes cast, the ban on affirmative action seems to remain intact, with over 56 percent of voters rejecting Proposition 16.

The campaign for the restoration of affirmative action was well-funded, with $31 million being raised for the effort.

[RELATED: Newsom's reparations task force MUST include one member from academia]

The University of California Board of Regents is heavily in favor of restoring affirmative action to its admissions. 

In the summer of 2020, the board unanimously voted to attempt to restore the practice.

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) supported Proposition 16, alongside her Senate colleague Dianne Feinstein.

California boasts the highest population of Asian-Americans in the United States, a demographic that some say face disproportionate discrimination as a result of affirmative action policies.  As Campus Reform previously reported, the United States Department of Justice is currently suing Yale University for allegedly discriminating against White and Asian-American students in its admissions practices.

[RELATED: DOJ sues Yale for discriminating against Whites, Asian Americans]

According to the Heritage Foundation, Asian-American students must score an average of 140 points higher on the SAT than White students, 270 points higher than Hispanic students, and 450 points higher than Black students to be admitted to elite schools. 

National Association of Scholars President Peter Wood responded to the failed effort in California, saying, “The people of California have once again shown that they are nowhere near as biased and fanatical as their local leaders. Almost twenty-five years ago the people of California said ‘no’ to discrimination and they’ve said it again today.”

Follow the author of this article on Twitter: @BenZeisloft



STAY INFORMED
Get exclusive access to breaking CampusReform stories as they happen. Sign up below and we'll keep you in the loop.
 Weekly Digest

 Daily Emails

Ben Zeisloft
Benjamin Zeisloft | Pennsylvania Senior Campus Correspondent

Benjamin Zeisloft is a Pennsylvania Senior Campus Correspondent, reporting on liberal bias and abuse for Campus Reform. He is studying Finance and Marketing at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Benjamin also writes for The UPenn Statesman and the Wharton International Business Review.

20 Articles by Benjamin Zeisloft